Tag: IBM

Lufthansa sells IT infrastructure to Big Blue

lufthansa-history-1German airline Lufthansa is about to sell its IT infrastructure unit to IBM as part of an outsourcing agreement for the services.

Europe’s largest airline by revenue is undergoing restructuring and cost-cutting efforts to better position itself to compete with low-cost carriers and Arabic rivals

It earlier this year said it was seeking a buyer for the unit, which provides data centres, networks and telephony. Apparently, it is worried that it requires a high level of investment and economies of scale, which the airline could not afford.

Under the deal, Lufthansa will outsource all of its IT infrastructure services to IBM for seven years. The US firm will take over the airline’s IT infrastructure division, currently part of Lufthansa Systems.

The deal will result in a one-off pre-tax charge of 240 million euro for Lufthansa. It will allow Lufthansa to reduce its annual IT costs by around 70 million euro a year. It is not clear how much this will all cost in the end as this is still being ironed out.

Big Blue slows down

sn_blu_mysIBM shocked the cocaine nose jobs of Wall Street by giving up its 2015 operating earnings target and moaning that it was suffering from a bad dose of weak client spending and a slumping software sector.

IBM shares fell nearly seven percent to a three year low, which must really hack off Warren Buffett whose Berkshire Hathaway owns seven percent of IBM shares. The decline shaved more than $13 billion off Big Blue’s market cap, which stood at $182 billion at the stock market close on Friday.

Ginni Rometty, IBM chairman, president and chief executive officer said that the result was disappointing and that the company saw a marked slowdown in September in client buying behavior, and our results also point to the unprecedented pace of change in our industry.

In a move to rid itself of one underperforming business, IBM also said on Monday it will hive off its loss-making semiconductor unit to contract chipmaker Globalfoundries.

“Some of these fundamental shifts in the industry are happening faster than we planned,” Rometty said on a call with analysts. “We are continuing to remix to higher value.”

To be fair, IBM is hardly the only technology company having a hard time keeping up. German software maker SAP cut its 2014 operating profit forecast on Monday, citing a faster-than-expected move to cloud-based software. Oracle has similar problems.

Revenue from the company’s cloud service unit, which allows businesses to access software and data remotely, grew more than 50 percent in the quarter, while mobile revenue doubled.

Still, they were not enough to offset weakness in servers and other hardware, as well as some software business lines.

IBM is spending $600 million for “workforce restructuring,” but did not specify how many employees would be cleaning out their desks.

IBM, which said it would announce a new operating earning per share target for 2015 in January, reported a 4 percent drop in third-quarter revenues as clients held back on spending in September.

Revenue fell to $22.4 billion in the quarter from $23.34 billion a year earlier. Wall Street expected $23.37 billion.

Net profit from continuing operations dropped to $3.46 billion, or $3.46 per share, from $4.14 billion, or $3.77 per share in the same quarter last year.


Avnet picks up Lenovo’s server business

avnettsMegadistributor Avnet said it has been appointed as a global Lenovo route to market.

This follows Lenovo’s acquisition of IBM’s System x (X86) server business early in the month.

Avnet said it will sell Lenovo servers in over 40 different countries around the world.

As well as Lenovo System x systems, Avnet will sell BladeCenter and Flex System blades and switches, X86 integrated system, NextScale and iDataplex servers, software and maintenance.

But this does not mean Avnet is waving goodbye to IBM. It’s worked with Big Blue for nearly 30 years and will continue to distribute IBM Power Systems, Storage Systems, Power Flex servers, training, software and services.

Tony Madden, a senior VP at Avnet Global said: “Avnet is working closely with Lenovo to ensure a seamless transition for existing System x channel partners and their customers.”

IBM pays Globalfoundries $1.5 billion to cut losses

IBM Not Servers Not SemisUpdate: IBM advised late Sunday that it will be making “a major business announcement” Monday morning along with its’ third-quarter results according to Bloomberg News.

This comes as no surprise to industry watchers. Sanjay Jah, CEO of Globalfoundries Inc. is well known as a shrewd negotiator – fees for taking over IBM’s semi ops were reported as high as $2 Billion.

IBM is shedding the company’s brick and mortar structure piece by piece to facilitate what the company sees as its new destiny. Commoditisation of semiconductor and hardware server content is seen as the motivation.

Margins in both businesses have decreased to the point where economies of scale must come into play – requiring ever-larger investments with ever decreasing margins draining capital away from the company’s core business strategy.

IBM announced that it is investing $3 Billion over five years on semiconductor research in a move to reassure its customer base that the company is continuing basic research to advance hardware and software technology indicating that the company will still be supporting high end research.

What’s not clear at this time:

  • Number of people affected
  • Timeframe
  • Whether all semiconductor operations are included
  • Power PC
  • Intellectual Property
  • Operating charges

We’ll be following up on details as they become available.


In a statement made this morning IBM will pay Globalfoundries Inc. $1.5 billion over the next three years to take over the company’s loss ridden semiconductor operation.

Globalfoundries will become IBM’s exclusive server processor foundry for 22nm, 14nm and 10 nm server and Power processors for the next decade.

IBM will take a third-quarter pretax charge of $4.7 billion.

 Job Retention

Globalfoundries will offer jobs to those affected in East Fishkill, New York and Essex Junction, Vermont. Workers at IBM’s commercial microelectronics business are also included in the offer.

Globalfoundries will gain access to IBM intellectual property and technologies related to IBM Microelectronics under the 10 year partnership agreement – making the foundry one of the largest semiconductor IP portfolios holders in the world.

 Trusted Foundry

The U.S. Government has used IBM as a supplier as a “trusted foundry” supplier for decades. Globalfoundries is privately owned by United Arab Emirates company called Advanced Technology Investment Company, or ATIC, a subsidiary of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.

There’s speculative agreement that Intel is the most likely candidate to take over the “trusted foundry” business from IBM.

IBM wants to dam big data deluge

IBM logoBig Blue says it has created a new model for enterprise data storage intended to work across a large number of IT solutions.

Jamie Thomas, general manager of storage at IBM, said that it’s time the “traditional” storage model must change. That’s because data is churned out to 2.5 billion gigabytes every day.

Enterprises need to make real time decisions based on this data.  Storage and data centres are the foundation for the model using analytical tools.

She said IBM has introduced something called the Elastic Storage Server, a software storage appliance that works in conjunction with IBM Power 8 servers.

She said that software defined storage is changing the entire industry and IBM can now sell products to customers that want to manage, organise, and use data as a competitive tool.

IBM will offers its Software Defined Storage products through Elastic Storage, SAN Volume Controller and the Virtual Storage Centre.

Lotus 1-2-3 is dead as a dodo

ex-parrotLotus 1-2-3 officially ended its existence yesterday as IBM’s previously announced execution date passed with barely any attention from the tech press.

Big Blue only stopped selling Lotus 1-2-3 last year after more than 30 years of stirling work.

Lotus 1-2-3 was a spreadsheet program developed by Lotus Software, which is now part of IBM. It managed to be the “killer application” which sold the PC to business. Its first victory was kicking the first spreadsheet, Visicalc out of the market. Lotus 1-2-3 was a three-in-one, integrated program which could handly spreadsheet calculations, database functionality, and graphical charts. It needed a dongle though.

The Lotus Development Corporation was founded by Mitch Kapor, a friend of the developers of VisiCalc. 1-2-3 was originally written by Jonathan Sachs, who had written two spreadsheet programs for Concentric Data Systems.

The fact it was written for IBM’s new PCs meant that it became the software test for the new range of PC clones that flooded the market.  Because it needed large amounts of memory, 1‐2‐3 helped popularise greater RAM capacities in PCs and soon a huge 640k was required.

However its days were numbered as Microsoft had a spreadsheet called Excel. As its Windows operating environment grew in popularity so did Excel and a revamp of 1-2-3 for Windows failed to make much impact. Excel didn’t need a dongle. It had Steve Ballmer, instead.

Lotus 1-2-3’s demise was not helped by the fact that Microsoft punished IBM for its use of 1-2-3 by charging IBM higher prices, a late licence for Windows 95, and the withholding of technical and marketing support. IBM punished Microsoft by declaring OS/2 was a better window than Windows.

As a result, Big Blue wasn’t granted OEM rights for Windows 95 until 15 minutes prior to the release of Windows 95, August 24, 1995. IBM machines were sold without Windows 95, while Compaq, HP, and other companies sold machines with Windows 95 on the day of release.

Despite all that, Lotus 1-2-3 had an extremely long run with a large chunk of the world’s business carried out using it. It needed a dongle, though.

Lenovo, IBM deal sealed

ibm-officeBig Blue and Lenovo confirmed they have completed the sales of IBM’s X86 server business, as expected.

Under the terms of the deal, Lenovo will buy System x, BladeCenter and Flex System blade servers and switches, X86 based Flex integrated systems, NeXtScale and iDataPlex servers as well as software, blade networking and maintenance operations.

IBM will keep its System z mainframes, its Power Systems, Storage Systems, Power based Flex servers and PureApplication and PureData appliances.

The two companies will collaborate in a deal where Lenovo will act as an OEM (original equipment manufacturer) for IBM, and will also resell some products from Big Blue’s storage and software portfolio.

The change starts today in most major markets. IBM said the deal will also be completed in most other territories in the next month or two.

Lenovo’s acquisition of IBM’s Intel based servers means that it’s now able to offer the entire range of X86 based systems, from humble notebooks up to high end  servers.

Lenovo carves up Chinese server pie

lenovo-logoAs we reported yesterday, Lenovo will acquire Intel’s X86 server business this week and that means it will be the biggest server company in mainland China.

Market research firm IDC released its figures for server sales in China for the first half of this year and Lenovo – which includes prior IBM system business – comes out the leader at 23.91 percent (see chart).

IDC said that the Lenovo/IBM X86 server line and IBM’s System x mainframes are highly complementary and Lenovo will use that synergy to sell more X86 systems into large organisations.

But Dell has been highly competitive in the Chinese market, and Lenovo’s entrance into this space is likely to lead to even more competition.

IDC thinks that Lenovo will integrate channels to market of IBM’s System x machines with its own routes to market and the entry of Lenovo as a player is likely to lead to better cooperation with Microsoft and VMWare.

And in the global market, Lenovo shows up as a leader with a market share of 11.7 percent.
Global X86 server market 1H 2014
China X86 server market H12014

IBM Lenovo sale is a done deal

A not so mobile X86 PCLenovo’s offer to buy the remainder of IBM’s X86 business is likely to be concluded this Wednesday.

IBM is disposing of the deal to the Chinese manufacturer for $1.8 billion and when the acquisition is complete, it will finally have washed its hands of all of its X86 business.

That doesn’t mean its out of the hardware business completely, of course.  It will carry on selling its mainframes and a number of other high profit and enterprise standard appliances.

It was the first to launch an X86 personal computer back in the 1980s but its exclusive hold in the market was swiftly dented by competition from clone makers such as Dell and Compaq.

The deal will be completed because it waited approval from the European Union, China and the USA. But authorities in these territories have raised no objections to the sale.

When the deal is complete, it will catapult Lenovo into the major league of X86 players and will let it diversify its business by targeting the lucrative high end of the market.

IT infrastructure worth $2.4 billion

IBM logoSales of worldwide integrated infrastructure and platforms rose by a third in the second quarter of this year with a net worth of $2.4 billion, compared to the same quarter a year back.

IDC defines integrated infrastructure and platforms as pre-integrated certified systems containin server hardware, disk storage systems, networking equipment and systems management software.

IDC said over 833 petabytes of storage capacity shipped, up 63.4 percent compared to the same quarter in 2013. All in all, the first half of 2014 showed the market grew by 35.9 percent compared to the first half of 2013 and was worth $4.3 billion.

IDC believes that integrated systems are considered critical by business.  Jed Scaramella, research director of enterprise servers at IDC said enterprise customers were “bullish” in adopting integrated systems and many more consider these when making IT procurement choices.

The top vendors in integrated platforms, were Oracle, IBM, HP, Hitachi and the usual “others”.  But an examination of the revenue growth delivered by these companies showed that HP managed to grow revenues by 92.1 percent compared to the same quarter in 2013, while IBM was in stasis and Oracle grew by 18.3 percent.

In the field of worldwide integrated infrastructure, the top three spots were occupied by VCE, Cicsco/Netapp and EMC.

Smartphones beat tablets on mobile sales

smartphones-genericA report by Monetate said data showed that mobile commerce continues to grow at a fair old pace.

Figures for the second quarter of 2014 available today showed that mobile commerce traffic rose by 120 percent compared to the same quarter in 2013 on smartphones. Tablet traffic grew by 35 percent and desktop traffic flatlined.

Even though mobile devices now generate 16 percent of all ecommerce traffic, revenue is less than four percent.  And mobile customers are more fickle with a 50 percent higher bounce rate, and a 30 percent lower “add to cart” rate.

Further, people using smartphones are 10 percent more likely to abandon a transaction.

“Mobile commercial traffic is increasing dramatically as consumers become more comfortable shopping via mobile [phones],” said Lucinda Duncalfe, CEO of Monetate.  “But the low conversion rates imply that brands need to create more relevant persnalised mobile experiences to take advantage of the opportunities.”

IBM, which contributed to the survey, said companies need to rethink their mobile strategies.  Jay Henderson, strategy director at IBM ExperienceOne said: “It’s a fairly complex process that involves reworking sites, using data to improve nagivation and deepen connections.”

The survey analyses a random sample of over seven billion online episodes.

Watson becomes a Sherlock

ibm-officeIBM formally announced Watson Analytics and, somewhat modestly, said it was its biggest announcement in a decade in analytics.

The software is a natural language based service that gives access to predictive and visual analytic tools for business.

The first version of Watson Analytics includes a version of its cloud service for desktops and mobiles.  The service allows access to data warehousing services.

IBM said Watson brings together self service analytics capabilities on the cloud and refine it, discover insights, predict outcomes, visualise results, create reports and allow collaboration with other people.

The company claims that using natural language lets people ask the right questions and get results that can be read and manipulated.  They can then refine their questions.

Intel shows off in-memory-database Biz

Intel-IDF-'14-Copy-SizeIntel’s Developer Forum 2014 annual meeting at San Francisco’s Moscone Center wound down yesterday. My assignment is to continue research on a technology that’s now ramping.

The computer industry is at the beginning of a major architectural shift – “In-Memory Database” (IMD) systems, originally aimed at solving near real-time solutions for analytic problems have successfully been applied to cognitive computing problems as well. The nascent application of “cognitive computing intelligence and predictive analytics” toolsets to IMD equipped servers is thought to be the first step in a new era in computing – quite possibly the next big thing.

The Google Effect
At the 2000 Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco a relatively unknown entrepreneur, while having a Keynote fireside chat with Andy Grove, said he’d like to take the entire Internet and put it in memory to speed it up – “The Web, a good part of the Web, is a few terabits. So it’s not unreasonable,” he said. “We’d like to have the whole Web in memory, in random access memory.”

The comment received a rather derisive reception from the audience and was quickly forgotten. The speaker, Larry Page, an unknown at the time, as was his startup company, Google – the company’s backbone consisted of 2,400 computers at the time.

Fast forward to the present – system vendors found their future in Big Data has a lot of the look and feel of Google’s “free to the public” offering. Google was the first to successfully deploy a massively parallel processing (MPP) network commercially using commodity servers – one that was delivering real-time data access on a worldwide basis. Their competitors realized that they could no longer remain competitive with systems that relied on high latency rotating magnetic media as the main store – in fact, solid state disks (SSD) are considered somewhat slow for the new realities of Big Data analytic computing.

The development – called “In-Memory Database” mounts the entire database (single system image – even enormous ones) into large scale memory arrays of Registered DIMMs – closely coupled with Multi Core Processors. The resulting increase in throughput accelerates not only transaction processing but also analytic application performance into real time. The frosting on the cake is that this architecture change applies to good advantage in the emerging cognitive computing space.

SAP – HANA, In-Memory Database Computing
In 2006 Hasso Plattner, Co-founder of SAP AG, took a bottle of red wine, a wine glass, some writing implements and paper to the garden behind his house. By the time he reached the bottom of the bottle there wasn’t much written on the paper. But he had reached the conclusion that in-memory systems were the future. Mr. Plattner had realized that for SAP to remain competitive it needed to innovate – Plattner believed that by changing the server design to accommodate massively parallel processing with enough memory to load an entire database when combined with columnar based storage software would have a revolutionizing effect on processing speeds for OLTP and OLAP applications.

Gathering a small group of PhDs and undergrads at the Hasso Plattner Institute, Plattner expressed the in-memory idea he wanted them to explore. The first prototype was shown in 2007 before an internal audience at the company’s headquarters in Waldorf, Germany. SAP management was skeptical that the idea would work – the team needed to prove that the concept of in-memory database would work under real world conditions.

Using contacts to advance the project, Mr. Plattner persuaded Colgate-Palmolive Co. to provide transaction data for the project. He also persuaded Intel’s Craig Barrett to secure the latest microprocessors for the labs ongoing effort. The company also set up an R&D facility in Palo Alto to be in close proximity to their innovation and research partner Stanford University.

SAP HANA was officially announced in May 2010 with shipments commencing with the release of SAP HANA 1.0 in November. The market was slow in adopting the technology convinced that it was still in an early stage of development. Analytics and the need to score a real reason for their customers to mount their IT to the cloud provided the market conditions SAP’s HANA needed to press its adaptation. SAP over time adopted HANA to the Cloud through successful partnering with a wide array of vendors making it the company’s fastest growing segment.

During the development of HANA, SAP discovered the amount of physical memory required to store an entire database could be reduced substantially (compressed) – in some cases by 100X. This had the effect of reducing power (less memory required) and made database searches more efficient (reduction of the empty set). The market implication was that the price of memory per gigabyte had finally reached a price/performance breakeven point in an application that could not be accomplished at that price any other way. DRAM producers have found their next “Killer Application”.

IBM’s Watson – Cognitive Computing Public Debut
IBM’s Watson is a Big Data analytics system running on 2,880 PowerPC cores with 16TBytes of DRAM. Estimated cost is reportedly just over $3 Million and it requires 200kW of power to operate. Watson’s inner workings have not been publicly released – what is known is that it runs under a tool IBM calls DeepQA, implemented in conjunction with Hadoop (a Java implementation of MapReduce) that runs under the SUSE Linux Enterprise Server Operating System.

IBM introduced Watson to the public by competing it against human opponents on the game show “Jeopardy” in February 2011 – establishing IBM and the Watson Brand in the public mind when it won the $1 Million Dollar prize for charity.

Watson’s ability to semantically interpret language implies a native ability to understand the context of questions – including puns and word plays that it handled amazingly well – questions of this nature typically remain a significant challenge for machine-based systems.

Watson’s creators have stated that the algorithms are “embarrassingly” parallel – the implication that the core engine is highly MapReduce in nature rather than the more traditional graph analytics approach. Conventional network control is adequate for such an engine reducing costs and falls within a Software Defined Networking (SDN) framework.

IBM previously missed the industry shift to data management from ISAM files to relational databases in the 1970’s even though they were the inventor of RDMS systems. Oracle took full advantage of this colossal gaff much to IBM’s dismay.

IBM announced the establishment of the Watson Business Unit in early March investing upwards of $1 Billion in the new entity. What is surprising is that the company had a fully established cloud based offering replete with a supporting ecosystem around Watson (now physically occupying three rack cabinets instead of the original nine). There is no lack of customer interest in Watson with over 1,000 third party developers signed on to date.

IBM emphasizes Watsons’ natural language capabilities and analytics to process and synthesize information in a manner similar to the way humans think – enabling quick comprehension and evaluation of large of amounts of human style communication data to generate and evaluate evidence based hypotheses – to adapt and learn from training, interaction and outcomes.

Server Commoditisation – IBM Going Fabless?
“Watson” is at the beginning of a bundling “strategy” by IBM that’s in line with its continued separation from its hardware origins. IBM’s internal politics sometimes show in decisions made by disparate groups within the company in efforts to preserve their own “silage”.

The persistent and widely spread rumor that IBM was selling their low-end server division began circulating in April 2013 with Lenovo the most likely buyer – it passed into obscurity before becoming a reality in January 2014. The trend toward server hardware commoditization is the driving force behind the sale. Margins in the low-end server space have decreased to the point where economies of scale must come into play – requiring ever-larger investments with ever decreasing margins draining capital away from the company’s core business strategy. Watson, on the other hand, is viewed as a “maximum best-fit scaling technology” for capitalizing on IBM’s capabilities as a company.

Recent rumors that IBM is accepting bids for its semiconductor operations are being taken seriously and lean toward Global Foundries as the favored bidder. IBM announced that it is investing $3 Billion over five years on semiconductor research in a move to reassure their customer base that the company is continuing basic research to advance hardware and software technology. The company has entered talks of selling the East Fishkill, N.Y. Fab to Globalfoundries Inc. though a definitive agreement has yet to be announced.

IBM is slowly being transformed into a mostly software and services company using commodity, software defined hardware. That it’s going fabless is no surprise – the question of who will fill the void of developing next generation semiconductor processes and the attendant processor architecture development.
In 2013 the odds were firmly on Intel – the lack of furthered commitment in IDF 2014 shakes this conclusion but remember that the E7 version will not be ready for prime time till next year or at best very late this calendar year.

IBM, deciding to take Watson to market, set out to solve cost, power and footprint issues through industry collaboration. The effects of this collaboration will have far ranging effects on the company, its hardware product line and industry partners.

IBM’s larger than usual presence at the Intel Developer Forum in 2013 with a keynote delivered by Diane Bryant, Intel Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Data Center Group further signaled IBM’s continued segue with Intel toward high end servers.
Intel’s Rack Scale Architecture

Intel has been developing its version of the “Disaggregated Server” named “Rack Scale Architecture” or RSA.

At the core of the Rack Scale Architecture is a technology Intel calls “Silicon Photonics” – developed under the premise that a system wide integrated silicon photonic based data highway woven into a hierarchical communication fabric will support massively parallel computing systems into the foreseeable future and remain a baseline architectural model for future growth. Copper interconnects do not scale reliably in server systems at data rates much above 10 Gbs per channel (multiple fiber channels (10) are combined to establish interconnects like 100 Gbit Ethernet).

The idea of a “silicon photonic” highway offers system architects freedom to allocate computational resources “at will”. This blends well with Software Defined Networking down to the computational element – essentially making an entire data center a virtual machine.

Key to this idea is the use of fiber optic cable capable of carrying 100 Gbps and up data channels (cluster of 4 fibers at 25 Gbps each) called “Silicon Photonics” by Intel.

Diane Bryant brought Andy Bechtolsheim – Founder, Chief Development Officer and Chairman of Arista Networks on stage to announce the company’s first shipments of the “Top of Rack Switch”. Bechtolsheim stated that Intel’s Silicon Photonic’s solved the cost issue allowing Arista’s TOR Switch to enter the market. Andy added that switches extending transmission distance from 200 meters to 2 kilometers required for Cloud data centers would be shipping in volume in Q1 CY 2015.

Intel’s Big Data Analytics Market Outlook
Diane Bryant saved the best for last in her keynote segment. She stated that McKinsey reported big data analytics can improve margins up to 60% through increased sales per visit through improved management of inventory and through optimized product pricing. Cost of compute has declined 40% and the cost of storage has declined 100% making it truly cost feasible to deploy these big data analytic solutions. She added that the E5V3 analytic server units were announced in a separate announcement on Monday. Unfortunately nothing was said about the massive E7s now in development.

Bryant went on stating “within a couple of years Hadoop will be the number one application. It will be running on more servers than any other single application. It will be more common for Enterprise IT than Enterprise ERP system. The big data market is growing at 35% CAGR it’s projected to be a $150 Billion business in silicon systems, software and professional services by 2020.”

TechEye Take Away
We’re not sure what happened between IBM and Intel. Comparing IBM’s presence last year compared to this year’s IDF was completely different. Relationships between companies can take wild swings over internal problems that are kept far from the public eye and we suspect that this may well be operative here. IBM is most interested in the E7 version which remains unannounced though sources report this is scheduled for some time in Q1 2015. We think the apparent lack of mutual devotion is temporary and helps to quiet internal silo wars at IBM for the time being.

Do not be surprised if Intel’s Data Centre Group breaks out into a separate, standalone forum next year.

Intel is working on multiple technology fronts to develop next generation data center architectures capable of real time transaction processing and analytical processing. Keep also in mind that these machines are completely capable of running Cognitive Intelligent Computing currently the domain of IBM but will first ramp in 2015 in an application span called Cognitive Analytics.

Remembering that analytics also includes voice and real-time voice translation leaves wide implications into a number of consumer space applications – think of a gate keeper service melded into cellular phone contracts.

In any regards Mark Bohr is still holding court over Intel’s process development – one of the company’s solid IDF anchors that’s still left at the company. The news is that Intel can build 14 nm FinFet 300 mm wafers in volume and is well on its way to 7 nm with a stop at 10 nm.

Storage software gets boost

emcRevenues from the worldwide storage software market rose by 6.3 percent in the second quarter of this year, according to figures from IDC.

It said revenues during Q2 2014 came to nearly $3.8 billion.

The leaders in the pack were  EMC, IBM and Symantec which had markt shares of 25.9 percent, 16 percent and 13.3 percent respectively.

Data protection and recovery software showed bigger growth, up 10.2 percent in the quarter, compared to the same quarter in 2013.  Revenues for those totalled $1.45 billion. storage infrastructure sales amounted to $448 million.  Storage and device management software sales rose by 4.1 percent to stand at $708 million.

Eric Sheppard, research director of storage software at IDC said there was broad growth over most markets.

”Sales of data protection and recovery software accounted for almost 60 percent of the spending during the quarter, driven by a market wide move to improve application resiliency, continued uptake in appliance based offering and healthy attach rates within the integrated systems market”, he said.

HP beefs up security

HPAccessData and HP are to get closer to each other by increasing security assessment and quick fixes for global organisations.

HP’s service arm, Rapid Incident Respons Services is intended to help corporations quickly investigate what’s gone wrong after a hack and provide forensic evidence of incidents.

HP will now provide further services using AccessData’s Resolution One to give advance warning of security threats and provide alerts to prevent networks, endpoints, mobile devices and applications being compromised.

AccessData claims its ResolutionOne offering will extend HP’s own service with capabilities including root cause analysis, full packet capture network forensics, data on hardware, assessment of malware, and auditing across enterprises.  ResolutionOne also lets security and response teams collaborate in real time with automated batch processing to eradicate threats.

AccessData says it has over 130,000 users in law enforcement, at law firms, government agencies and corporations.