Tag: Homeland Security

Homeland Security deletes Einstein files

einstineThe Department of Homeland Security has promised to delete records from a controversial network monitoring system called Einstein.

The files to be deleted are at least three years old, and the reasons for the deletion is not exactly altruistic.

DHS thinks the files, which include data about traffic to government websites, agency network intrusions and general vulnerabilities, are a waste of space.

The irony is that some security experts claim that the DHS would be deleting a treasure chest of historical threat data and privacy experts claim that destroying it could eliminate evidence that the government-wide surveillance system does not work.

Either way it appears that the spooks cannot win.

According to Homeland Security’s rationale a three-year retention period for reference purposes is sufficient, and “the records have no value beyond that point” but can be kept longer, if needed, appraisers said.

Some incident reports, which include records on catastrophic cyber events, must be kept permanently. Apparently the spooks are keen to save space on their servers. Keeping too much data costs an arm and a leg.

Johannes Ullrich, dean of research at the SANS Technology Institute warned that older intrusion-detection records provide insight into the evolution of threats, said. Analysts there sometimes need even older data to answer today’s research questions.

He thinks the intrusion records would be made available to the public in some form. The Einstein data would likely be a goldmine for researchers, as it documents attacks against very specific networks in a consistent way over a large extent of time, he said.

Lee Tien, senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation said that  getting rid of data about people’s activities is a pro-privacy, pro-security step.  But “if the data relates to something they’re trying to hide, that’s bad.”

It is possible the records could reveal the monitoring tools make mistakes when attempting to spot threats.

According to Next Gov  The public has until Dec. 19 to request a copy of the records retention plan. Comments are due within 30 days of receipt.

Homeland Security wants to save Expendables

Expendables-3_Expendables-2US Homeland Security, which is supposed to be defending the country from terrorists, is using taxpayer money to defend the business model of Big Content.

The US Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement is investigating the piracy of the Lionsgate action flick The Expendables 3. Lionsgate made calls to several law-enforcement agencies to using their spying technology to locate the pirates, who are accused of leaking a full version of the pic on various file-sharing sites last week.

Apparently, it is not so unusual lately for the men in black, who you would think would be dealing with people with guns trying to bring down the government, to be defending big corporate interests. U.S. Customs was merged into USDHS, and it investigates illegally distributed copyrighted materials, including media content.

In the past, it has actually seized domain names of websites used to illegally distribute media content and/or counterfeit goods.

Lionsgate filed suit against the sites hosting the pic and the same day it dropped the final trailer (see it below) that opens wide August 15.

The digital copy was stolen from the Studio last week and news of the download surfacing wide by the time Comic-Con was in full swing last weekend. There were 250,000 downloads on that first day and an estimated two million afterwards.

Flat battery? You don’t fly

pressieThe self-feeding paranoia of US airport security checks has just reached a new level as Homeland Security has become worried about computers which do not switch on.

According to Gizmodo, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson woke up in a cold sweat worried about all those people who get onto planes with flat batteries on their electronic devices.
Johnson said devices that won’t turn on will be confiscated, and passengers may be diverted for “additional questioning”.

The fear is that a terrorist will be on a plane with smartphone or laptop with a flat battery and this will mean… well we are not quite sure. The whole point of checking electronic gear was to make sure that it could not be used as part of a terrorist attack, however if it does not work then it can’t be.

However Johnson thinks that people who don’t charge their gear before they get on a flight must be terrorists and should not be allowed to board a plane.  Our next bet is that he will wake up in the morning with a fear that those who don’t wash their hands before they get on board a plane are terrorists.

Practically this means that if you are dumb enough to bring any electronics on a plane on US soil you should have it fully charged beforehand.   It is much safer to stick your electronics inside your suitcase, where if it is a bomb it is not going to be probed by TSA officials.

AP mentions that American intelligence officials have been worried about terrorists finding new ways to bring explosives onto airplanes undetected and apparently they have vivid imaginations.  Already we have that dumb rule about water bottles, and toiletries, you can’t wear a belt, or high heels.  The process of getting on the plane is now longer than the flight.